As for me, I'm in agreence with Michael Foster. "I would like to suggest that Melibee itself casts doubt on such a binary opposition because it disregards a schism between oral and literate communication, and it embodies the spirit of publicly performed and interpreted literature; in my view, the style of the Melibee combines with its content—the debate on revenge versus forgiveness—to invite a communal response" (411).
In his article, Foster discusses the value of the shared-experience amongst medieval readers and how a tale filled with so much moral discourse and discussion would inevitably lead to numerous debates between said medieval readers.
So maybe, Chaucer was just giving the people of his time a thick tale to chew on...
Foster, Micahel. "Echoes of Communal Response in the Tale of Melibee." The Chaucer Review 42.4 (2008): 409-430.
No comments:
Post a Comment